CHAPTER 2 NO MUSIC INHERENTLY EVIL Anyone who has been a Christian for any length of time at all and who is interested in rock music, has heard somebody tell a story, ostensibly always true, about missionaries who played a tape of some rock music for natives in an African village somewhere, who recoil in horror, recognizing the rhythms of the music to be the same as that which the local witch doctor uses to drum up demonic spirits in rituals. I'm not even saying that this couldn't happen, but to use this story as a basis for categorizing rock music as evil, is to me naive at best. I've never personally known anybody who reported this story, and it's my take that this story is just another urban legend, passed down as true but never substantiated by any proof. It's my conviction that no pattern of notes, rhythm, or melody is inherently evil. Much has been said in recent years by well meaning men of God about the spiritual darkness of ALL rock music and even Christian rock being branded as being "of the devil". I see this as a very narrow view, and that people who espouse this opinion have not really thought it through. Conversely, I also do not believe that all rock is of God. It's not my intention in this book to try to prove that rock is either good or bad, as I believe both those positions to be extremes, and naive opinions at best. What I will attempt to do is to present some ideas that will expand the horizons of thought for the reader which will hopefully produce a more thoughtful dialogue that we have been able to have up until now. It is my hope to provide some tools by which we can properly spiritually discern what is appropriate for us to listen to and what is not. I've thought and meditated on this subject for many years, and having been a forerunner in the field of contemporary Christian music in my days with LOVE SONG, the first Christian "rock" group, I feel qualified to present some of my insights formed out of my years of experience. Let me begin by explaining my opening statement that "no pattern of notes, rhythm or melody is inherently evil." In order to understand this, we have to differentiate between the "stuff", or substance of music, and the morals of the music. The "stuff" of music, the notes, the rhythm, man's capacity to respond to that rhythm and melody, were all created by God, out of nothing. God is the only one who can create something out of nothing. The system of music, the laws of music, our capacity to respond, all were created by God. Neither Satan nor man can create something out of nothing. The best man can do is take the raw material that is already there, and build something out of it. That's the best that Satan can do, too. Although I believe that he's a master musician all he can do is make music that is derived from the original gift of music which is from God. Therefore, what he does is pervert and counterfeit the music of God to accomplish his own purposes. He may even create a whole style of music that would not be something the Holy Spirit would have anything to do with, but he's still working with the substance, the laws, the system that God created. So the morals of such music would be evil in intent and function, but the "stuff" is just music. A simplification of the real question here then is "is the stuff of rock music inherently immoral?" I really don't think so but I think that the stuff can be put together to produce an immoral result. For further clarity, let us compare music to the written word. No letter or group of letters is evil in itself. It's just ink on paper, but if you form a word with the right four letters, you can produce a negative response on the part of the person reading that word. This response is not based on any inherent evil in the letters, but on the background, the social upbringing of the reader and once again, laws and systems which God established, in this case, of language and communication. Speak that word into the atmosphere, and it's not the sound waves that are evil, or the motion of the vocal chords, but rather the response of the listener to the meaning of the word, often based on his cultural background. It has been my experience that some words have different meanings in different countries. Some words that we think quite innocent here in the United States have very lewd meanings in other countries, and I have learned the hard way, having been graciously corrected by a host in those countries when I used the offensive word, to me, quite innocently. I think this works as an allegory to demonstrate the truth about music, specifically rock, as that is the basic subject of this book. Although I contend that no music is inherently evil, I do believe that there are many ways that music can be used for evil purposes, and be a conveyor of spiritual evil, even to the point of being a vehicle for evil spirits to gain entry into the listener's life. By and large, the negative response that a Christian listener would have to any form of music would be due to factors other than inherent evil in the music. He might react negatively due to memory associations, the music acting as a link to his past life before Jesus, or to other unpleasant times or experiences in his life. Negative reactions could be precipitated by prejudices and biases which were taught him my parents, toward some music which they don't like. And of course, many kinds of negative responses could be the result of a reaction to the spirit of the music, that is the way that Satan has put the music together and uses it to accomplish his purposes, but not by some inherent evil in the music itself. But all this does not negate the reality that if music is producing negative responses in a person, then it could be wrong for that person to listen to it in good conscience. Let's take "cocktail room" jazz for instance. For me the sound of that music conjures up memories of a drink in my hand, a cigarette in my lips, and would have very little ability to minister life to me in any capacity. And yet when I listen to some of the jazzy praise music that is available, the spirit is different, and although by personal taste I would probably not listen to it often, it doesn't offend me, and when I have listened to it I've enjoyed it. A huge area of consideration is the sexual element. Some people relate to music on a much more sensual level than others, and certain secular music, even just the music part, will conjure up impure responses. Some soul and R&B type rhythms have a strong sexual attitude, and this kind of rhythm coupled with the right bass line and other sounds, would probably not ever be produced by the Holy Spirit. An interesting and fun exercise was put together by the Christian group "Glad" many years ago, and performed in their concerts, where they took an old hymn, and performed it in a range of styles from different eras of history. They did it in a baroque style, classical, blues, jazz styles, they did it as the Beach Boys might do it, then in a more rock oriented style, and the result is hilarious and challenging. You find yourself reacting in different ways as the different styles are performed, and it really opens up your mind to the importance of the way that music is treated and presented in any given song. Some of the styles were offensive to my musical and spiritual sensibilities, but a couple I thought were a vast improvement over the original style. This video, incidentally, is available through Al Menconi Ministries, who's address is found in the back of this book. Now Satan may combine elements of music that will result in music that would never be produced by the Holy Spirit ever, and that music could probably be rightfully called evil, but in the area of rock this would be limited in my opinion mostly to the "heavy metal" "death rock" and some hard rock kind of music. Now unless you think I'm contradicting myself, let me clarify that I said I didn't believe that the notes, the rhythm in itself, the melody, the actual components of the song are in themselves evil. But I do believe that when these elements are properly combined, they can produce an evil effect, and be used of the Devil. In that sense then, that music could be termed "evil". Let me also say here, that I believe there are many styles of music, or individual compositions within a style category that would not be produced by the Holy Spirit, not just rock music. RIGHTEOUS AND UNRIGHTEOUS JUDGMENTS I don't believe there is much of a question on the part of discerning Christians that some music by certain groups such as AC/DC, Slayer, Motley Crew, is born in hell, and truly is "of the devil". But when we say a song was "born in hell", it's really the spirit of the music that we are objecting to, which is made up of many elements. The life style and intent of the performer, the meaning of the lyrics, the manner in which the song is performed, etc., all play a part in how the music comes across and in how we receive it. Where I think Christian musicians often miss it, is that they often combine some elements that are born of the spirit, with elements that are of the wrong spirit, and the same rules as above apply. Their life style, their intent, their relationship with God is often shallow, their knowledge of the word is limited, so their ability to be led of the Spirit is limited. What results is a reflection of their immaturity, a perverted mix of elements, some with the wrong spirit, and the resulting song is unable or at least limited in it's ability to convey the anointing of God. Sometimes their judgment, or their ignorance of what may be acceptable or not results in a perverted mix which brings us to another problem. Who becomes the standard of orthodoxy by which we all comply? Well I believe that it is a subjective matter, and will be different for different people. What stumbles one may not stumble another. The same rules apply in making this discernment. The maturity of the believer, how renewed his mind is to the things of God, his musical background and tastes, will all have a hand in deciding how he will respond to different kinds of music. I'm not denying that some Christian rock seems to be unable to carry the anointing of God at all, and may even be more harmful than good, but the bottom line is that the judgment of whether any music made by Christians is of God or not is up to God. To brand any music that is composed by people who confess to be Christian as "of the devil" is dangerous. What I do believe we have the right to do is make a judgment call on whether that music is part of our life or not, and frankly, there's some secular music I would be more comfortable that my kids listen to than some Christian rock. At least with some "neutral" or "G-rated" music, (I will deal with this concept in a later chapter) because it is clearly secular but may have a few or no offensive elements, the lines can be more clearly drawn, and my kids would know that this music is just for entertainment, will not necessarily enrich them spiritually, and that's that. On the other hand, some of the music made by Christians is so confusing, that it's more difficult to keep clear lines by which to guide them. "Well honey, I know they're Christians but that song really doesn't have a lot of spiritual value." etc. But I do have the right to judge Christian music (music made by Christians) in regard to whether it ministers to me or my family, and much Christian music would never be a part of our lives. You have the same right, but remember what's wrong for you may be OK for someone else. The same rules apply for a pastor discerning what groups to have in to play at church, except now he's making a subjective judgment for the whole congregation, which is his job. Later on, we will have some discussion of how some music could be right for some, and wrong for others in the chapter dealing with the unrenewed mind, and the worshippers heart. So although rock music can and is being used for evil purposes, I also believe that it can and is also being used by God for righteous purposes. If I haven't lost you yet, read on as we discuss... (c)1998 Chuck Girard Ministries